We are going to quote a passage from the book Dismantling The Big Bang by Williams and Hartnett Then we will ask some questions that are ignored by unbelievers who support the Big Bang Theory or just provide nonsensical and superficial answers to.
The Big Bang Model begins in a singularity- all matter, energy, time and space of the universe squashed into a single point of temperature and density. Somewhere between 13 and 17 billion years ago, an unknown event occurred that initiated expansion from the singularity. The expanding universe then near instantaneously inflated byt an astronomical amount to iron out ‘wrinkles’ and prevent recollapse.
The resulting fireball produced an expanding cloud of mostly hydrogen gas. The gas condensed into stars and galaxies (or perhaps galaxies and then stars). Many generations of stars came and went, each exploding to produce the elements heavier than helium, which were recycled into succeeding generations of stars.
About five billion years ago our sun formed by gravitational collapse of a gas and dust cloud. The leftover gas and dust ‘accreted’ by some unknown means into larger and larger ‘planetismals’.
As these planetismals grew larger,, the impacts melted them and eventually they grew large enough to form planets. The earth cooled, the surface hardened, water appeared from somewhere, life formed, and man eventually came to write books on cosmology… (pg. 115)
The unbelieving world is famous for demanding physical evidence for biblical content. They refuse to believe because of the ‘God did it’ factor or for other reasons. This is done regardless of the fact that there are scores of physical evidence from various scientific and other sources proving the validity of the biblical content.
So our first question is: Where is the physical evidence for each of these stages? Unbelievers cannot use the excuse ‘it was so long ago, the evidence disappeared’ Nor can they use the excuse that each stage wiped out earlier physical evidence.
And on it goes. We demand that the unbeliever produce verifiable and real physical evidence for each stage of their Big Bang Theory. If they can’t provide any or just offer excuses, then they need to be silent on the universe’s origins.
They cannot prove their theory so it is not true and not a viable option to the creation account. The existence of stars, planets, comets, etc., does not provide any evidence for the alleged processes unbelievers claim took place.
The existence of the universe and its contents does not exclude the biblical account of creation nor any other alternative to it.
The second question is: Where did water come from? It is here so where is the source and back the answer up with verifiable physical evidence for the source of water. The presence of ice on Earth does not account for the existence of water since ice is made of water.
Also, cooling temperatures do not account for the source of water for the unbeliever would still have to prove how the cooling temperatures produced ice, or will they say that ice always existed even though the Big Bang Theory calls for an initial highly heated content.
Third, Are the unbelievers claiming that time, energy, matter, etc., are eternal? If so, how can they prove those elements always existed? If not, where did they come from? What real, verifiable physical evidence do they have to prove either condition for those elements?
Fourth, where did gravity come from? The unbeliever cannot say that gravity developed as planets, stars, etc., got bigger. That unknown process does not explain the source that created gravity nor does it explain how gravity developed to such an extent that it holds objects in place while at the same time letting them move around or escape its clutches.
The unbeliever needs to provide verifiable, real physical evidence proving the source of gravity as well as the development of this field.
With the Bible, we have the answers to these questions– God and his power. Yes, God did it and science cannot produce any physical evidence for any of the alternative theories it proposes.
All science can do is offer an alternative explanation for what they observe in the present. When science and scientists omit God, then they have no possible avenue to produce one shred of evidence to support their theories.
The so-called evidence they claim that proves their theories correct is not real evidence. Scientists have no hope of proving those alleged items are real evidence because they do not know if they played a role in the origin of the universe or life or not.
They are merely guessing and have no clue how the universe came to be. So-called background radiation is not evidence for anything except for the presence of background radiation.
Looking at something in the present means one has to guess at how it came to be if they have no written information proving it is evidence for origins. The only document that has written evidence for our origins is the Bible.
When scientists toss that then they are left with nothing. Nothing they claim in their theories leads them closer to the truth. The reason this is so is because they cannot produce one shred of physical evidence for every step of the Big Bang or life’s formation, etc.
Yes, they can say they have evidence, but upon closer scrutiny, their claims remain unproven and simple guesswork. That leads us to two more questions:
The ‘explosion’ from which the big bang got its name is supposed to have happened in this region, but no one knows what caused it or how it happened (pg. 116-117)
How do they know it was an ‘explosion’ and not God’s power that did it? They need to provide real verifiable physical evidence to prove it was an ‘explosion’ and not a supernatural act.
Then at 10 to the -36 powerseconds, somehting very startling happens- the universe undergoes a near instantaneous ‘inflation’ by a thousand billion billion billion times. It appears that the big bang was not big enough- another bang was needed (pg. 117)
Where is the real verifiable physical evidence for this event? Saying it took place or saying ‘I believe…’ or ‘we believe…’ is not physical evidence. That is just propaganda.
There is just so much in the Big Bang Theory that lacks any supporting physical evidence. Under the unbelievers’ rules, it did not happen unless they can produce the real, verifiable physical evidence to prove that it did.
Everything that science says about origins must be taken by faith, something the unbeliever finds anathema to do when it comes to God and the Bible. Yet, we have more real verifiable physical evidence for God and the Bible than all the scientists in the world have for their origin theories.
Even the super conductor experiments do not provide any physical evidence for the Big Bang. Those collisions do not create larger objects but help to disintegrate them into very tiny particles.
Then those particles have their role in our origins read into them, not taken out of them. That behavior is also done without any supporting real, verifiable physical evidence supporting those conclusions or ideas.
No matter what scientists do, they cannot compete with or disprove the Bible or God.
theologyarchaeology 