We posted this on our sister website but felt it should get a broader readership. Metal Detecting & Archaeology Since we wrote the previous piece on metal detecting and its interesting relationship, we did some more research on the topic. It seems that there is a long-standing history between the hobby and the research field. But … Continue reading An Interesting Topic
Category: archaeology
The Problem With Science
For the Christian science can never be an authority on the past or past events. In their book 'Dismantling the Big Bang', authors Alex Williams & John Hartnett have made a very good statement: Science works in the present, by observation and experiment; it has no direct access to the past. (pg. 14) This is … Continue reading The Problem With Science
What We Do Not Hear 2
Because it is the holiday season we will post the 2nd part of what we do not hear on this website. ---------------------------- We are continuing to look at the book Zondervan Handbook of Biblical Archaeology by Price and House. This time we will be going through the Introduction and picking out some key quotes that … Continue reading What We Do Not Hear 2
What We Do Not Hear
We posted this article first at theoarch.wordpress.com ------------------------------------------------------------------- We are reading a biblical archaeology book called Zondervan Handbook of Biblical Archaeology by Randall Price and H. Wayne House, both authors are reported Christians and we have read 2 of Dr. Price’s books years ago. This book is just one example of why we addressed the … Continue reading What We Do Not Hear
The Evolutionary Agenda
We have quoted from the book Darwin: Before & After by Robert Clark a couple of times as it is a good book. It is probably one of the more honest, objective works on evolution we have read over the years. Even though it was published in 1948, we highly recommend that you get a … Continue reading The Evolutionary Agenda
The Fallacy of Observation
Much tadoo is made by scientists about observation. They feel that observation is vital to their work. In some cases that is correct, their observations are valid and vital to their work. However, it is not valid nor even legitimate when it comes to applying observation to specific modern scenarios that have a history to … Continue reading The Fallacy of Observation
There Was Only One: Ancient Earth Supporters Are Not Always Honest
This will be the final segment in this series and it is only going to focus on 1 statement made on page 29 of the book 'Grand Canyon: A Monument to an Ancient Earth. This statement is found in a little side-by-side comparison at the bottom of the page. That statement reads: There is no … Continue reading There Was Only One: Ancient Earth Supporters Are Not Always Honest
There Was Only One: Where to Look
We have been taking isolated passages out of the book, The Grand Canyon: Monument to an Ancient Earth, to show our readers how wrong those authors, and people like them, are. The next passage comes from pgs. 207-08: Herein lies the difference between science and flood geology- science goes where the data leads, flood geology … Continue reading There Was Only One: Where to Look
There Was Only One: What They Leave Out
By they, we mean those progressive 'Christians' who oppose a young earth creation and that Noah's Flood was global. Here is what the authors of the book 'The Grand Canyon: A Monument to an Ancient Earth have to say on page 131: The fact that some types of fossils are never found together, is our … Continue reading There Was Only One: What They Leave Out
There Was Only One
We bought the book The Grand Canyon: A monument to an Ancient Earth the last time we were at a used book store. It is not a creationist's guide to using the Grand Canyon as evidence for Noah's Flood. On page 25, the authors wrote: Muliple Scientific arguments can be made and have been made … Continue reading There Was Only One