RSS

A Creative Theory

28 Jan

http://www.christianpost.com/news/rare-fossilized-footprints-belonging-to-nightmarish-dinosaur-found-in-canada-173631/

Combing through the Six Peaks dinosaur track site in British Columbia, Canada, paleontologists discovered a footprint which hasn’t been observed anywhere else in the world.

The print belongs to a four-toed meat-eating early Cretaceous-era dinosaur known as Therizinosaur, according to Richard McCrea of the Peace Region Palaeontology Research Centre. Based on the near 55 centimeter-long tracks, the dinosaur is estimated to have been around the height of a small Tyrannosaurus Rex or the average telephone pole

 

Really!?  You can tell all of that from a footprint, amazing. Evolutionists get weirder every day with their discoveries and how they lived. No evidence to support their thinking yet they talk like it is gospel fact.

 

There are many more discoveries yet to be made at this site which is one of the most diverse of its kind in the world. Currently, the 700 square meters of the site which have been uncovered have already yielded 1,200 tracks belonging to at least a dozen different creatures. McCrea and his team plan to triple the exposed area over the coming years in the hopes of finding more revelatory discoveries like this one.

 

Evolutionists and most scientists do not follow or have the spirit of truth guiding them, do not listen to them for they do not know the truth about our past.

Advertisements
 

13 responses to “A Creative Theory

  1. Ashley Haworth-roberts

    January 30, 2017 at 4:11 pm

    “Evolutionists and most scientists do not follow or have the spirit of truth guiding them, do not listen to them for they do not know the truth about our past.” And you are anti science.

     
  2. Ashley Haworth-roberts

    January 31, 2017 at 7:56 pm

    *** ed. note– please place a comment in your comment. Do not arbitrarily place a link

     
  3. Ashley Haworth-roberts

    February 1, 2017 at 9:15 pm

    I posted a link to the open-to-all British Centre for Science Education community forum where I made a comment as follows:
    “His own words betray how he is profoundly and rabidly anti-science.
    https://theologyarchaeology.wordpress.com/2017/01/28/a-creative-theory/#comments
    But if scientists are not allowed to draw any conclusions about extinct creatures from real fossilised bones or footprints then creationist zealots like ‘David Tee’ are not allowed to draw any conclusions about what ‘behemoth’ in Job 40 might conceivably have been either.”

     
    • theologyarchaeology

      February 2, 2017 at 2:06 am

      But they are not drawing real conclusions about extinct creatures. they are making stuff up based upon reading into what they have before them. Fossilized bones and footprints have far too much information missing for anyone to draw conclusions.

      Conjecture, assumption, leaps to conclusions etc., are not scientific conclusions nor conclusions based upon real facts.

       
  4. Ashley Haworth-roberts

    February 3, 2017 at 12:03 am

    “But they are not drawing real conclusions about extinct creatures. they are making stuff up based upon reading into what they have before them,”

    That’s your opinion masquerading as fact. You confuse putting forward evidence-based hypotheses with alleged false story telling. You don’t even seem to understand why people become scientists. Which I suggest is the pursuit of knowledge.

     
    • theologyarchaeology

      February 3, 2017 at 7:10 am

      No,

      I am tired of you already. Your closed mind renders discussion useless.

       
  5. Bible & Science Forum: Professor Tertius

    February 15, 2017 at 2:21 am

    You can tell all of that from a footprint, amazing.
    Yes. It is indeed amazing. But that is how a knowledge of geology, paleontology, and comparative anatomy can make such identifications possible. Footprints provide a lot of vital information—and the fact that it was found in Cretaceous strata was also important. Cretaceous strata in China have yielded a lot of important information about Therizinosaur.

    No evidence to support their thinking yet they talk like it is gospel fact.

    Yet, you own post cites some of that evidence!

    Have you studied comparative anatomy? Paleontology? Geology? Didn’t think so.

    Sounds like a Kruger-Dunning Effect at work in your suppositions and leaps to conclusions.

    Fossilized bones and footprints have far too much information missing for anyone to draw conclusions.

    Did you read the original published paper in order to grasp the evidence that was found? Why do you think that we can’t draw conclusions from the evidence God has given us in his creation. The Bible says that God has revealed his truths in his creation, so you are denying God’s claims. “The heavens are telling.” Do you think them silent?

    Yet, I suppose the best way to deny any evidence which defies your man-made traditions and which exposes your errors is to simply claim that God’s creation can’t be trusted to tell us anything about the past and about what God has created. Your choice. God has given you free will.

    Conjecture, assumption, leaps to conclusions etc., are not scientific conclusions nor conclusions based upon real facts.

    Yes, that explains why I left the Young Earth Creationist movement many years ago. It denies the evidence God has provided in his scriptures and God’s creation.

     
    • theologyarchaeology

      February 16, 2017 at 1:09 am

      Again, it is all speculation even when you use comparative anatomy and other related subjects because you cannot verify one conclusion or assumption or leap to a conclusion.

      Why you can’t draw conclusions from the evidence given in God’s creation? It s because that ‘evidence’ is declared by those who do not follow or have the spirit of truth and belong to the blind deceived secular world.

      There is nothing to state that dirt and fossils are evidence for anything except that a creature lived at a particular point i history. A history that does not confirm nor is authored by evolutionary timelines.

      How can there be evolutionary evidence when God used his supernatural power to create everything in 6 24 hour days?

       
      • Bible & Science Forum: Professor Tertius

        February 26, 2017 at 5:19 am

        “How can there be evolutionary evidence when God used his supernatural power to create everything in 6 24 hour days?”

        Exactly! That is the question you should be asking yourself. Is it possible that you have misinterpreted what Genesis 1 is saying and not saying?

         
        • theologyarchaeology

          February 26, 2017 at 6:04 am

          I have asked that question in different ways and the answer always comes out that there is no evolutionary evidence in existence because evolution has never existed. All supposed declarations for evolutionary evidence is made by unbelievers reading into what they find in the world what they want to see and not what is actually there.

          No I did not ‘misinterpret’ Genesis, evolutionists have disbelieved and rejected Genesis 1 and 2 as well as not understood it.

           
          • Bible & Science Forum: Professor Tertius

            February 26, 2017 at 7:46 am

            All supposed declarations for evolutionary evidence is made by unbelievers….

            So you simply declare all of us “unbelievers”? Is Francis Collins an unbeliever? Are all born again Christian evolutionary biologists “unbelievers”? I suppose it makes your world a simpler one.

            You are simply repeating denial-mantras to yourself. The damage you are doing to the Kingdom of the Lord Jesus Christ is very real. You are creating unnecessary stumbling blocks to the Gospel because many people eventually realize that you are bearing false witness. (I assume that you are doing so without realizing it, but you are repeating lies about the science nonetheless.)

            A half century ago I was just as passionately anti-evolution and I considered myself true to the scriptures and a faithful advocate of what I thought was the only possible legitimate interpretation of Genesis 1 and 2. I pray that the Lord will bring you to clarity and repentance in a process that is faster than what mine was.

            If not, our disagreement will be understood by both of us in eternity.

            Remember: All truth is God’s truth.

             
  6. theologyarchaeology

    February 27, 2017 at 2:00 am

    ****So you simply declare all of us “unbelievers”? Is Francis Collins an unbeliever? Are all born again Christian evolutionary biologists “unbelievers”? I suppose it makes your world a simpler one***

    Belief and unbelief is defined by God and if you do not believe God and what he wrote, how can you be called a believer? Collins does not believe God but believes science over God’s word, what do you think?

    ****You are simply repeating denial-mantras to yourself. The damage you are doing to the Kingdom of the Lord Jesus Christ is very real. You are creating unnecessary stumbling blocks to the Gospel because many people eventually realize that you are bearing false witness.****

    We do not change the truth to win souls to Christ for then we are not winning souls to Christ but having them believe in a Jesus and God than the one represented in the Bible.I am not doing any damage to the kingdom by keeping to the truth and excluding the lies told by secular science.

    You cannot damage the kingdom when you tell the truth and any evolutionary model is not the truth. The people who do the actual damage to the kingdom are those who say God lied inGenesis and present an evolutionary alternative.

    ****A half century ago I was just as passionately anti-evolution and I considered myself true to the scriptures and a faithful advocate of what I thought was the only possible legitimate interpretation of Genesis 1 and 2. I pray that the Lord will bring you to clarity and repentance in a process that is faster than what mine was.****

    Sorry for your move to disbelievement. I have the truth and it does not include any evolutionary idea. Titus tells us that God cannot lie so why didn’t he tell us everything if Genesis was not correct.

    Jesus said that if it were not so he would have told us, so why didn’t he correct Moses when he was here on earth? One would think that Jesus would not leave his disciples and followers with lies.

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: